A colleague had sent that around a few weeks ago. And when I passed it on to John Eaton (of Octave fame), he quickly replied
That's pretty funny, but a google search for
popular mechanics 2004 home computer
turned up this link:
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/hoaxes/computer.asp
So it's a hoax, after all.
It shows the wild swing in the traded price of the 'Bush elected' contract over this afternoon and evening ... up to the point when all prices went to 1.0, and back up just moments ago. Was that a denial of service attack? Server overload? Operator error?
And silly at the same time -- as it is about quantifying the arguably rather multidimensional aspects of, gasp, several social sciences discplines onto a two-dimensional plane (spanned by the, as far as the site goes, outdated 'left / right' metric, applied to an Economics axis, as well as polital liberalism vs authoritarian axis). Given that I was nerdy enough to endure schooling all the way to a doctoral degree in quantitative methods in social sciences (Econometrics, if you cared to ask), I have quite some empathy for the undertaking (as I also care a lot about empirical work if and when it is done well), as well as countless objections. But then again, we just did that mostly for the fun of it, didn't we?
And no, I'm not going to say how I scored on these two dimensions of
'economic left/right' and 'authoritarian / libertarian'. But if I told you
that I've read the Economist for close
to two decades, you'd get an idea.